PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.63%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.63%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
315.91%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
315.91%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
460.42%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-266.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-266.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4117.61%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4117.61%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
48.45%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
48.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-24.46%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NEM's 63.42%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
7.29%
We show growth while NEM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.98%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
15.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.72%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.37%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NEM's 18.49%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.