PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.82%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NEM's 4.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
26.25%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NEM's 6.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
25.56%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 22.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
25.56%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 22.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
29.72%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.67%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
79.67%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
45.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 34.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
-25.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NEM stands at 21.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
24.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 40.77%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
569.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1286.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 31.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Firm’s AR is declining while NEM shows 14.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 89.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.18%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.66%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.59%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 3.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.