PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.36%
Negative revenue growth while NEM stands at 10.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
9.63%
Gross profit growth of 9.63% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
17.56%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.56%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.89%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-5.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
10.37%
Share change of 10.37% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
20.16%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.69%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 10.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.69%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 73.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
24.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of NEM's 32.91%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
25016083.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-0.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NEM stands at 35.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6533.86%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
505.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 84.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133689.28%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 147.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
637.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
432.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 33.40%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
513.55%
Our AR growth while NEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.07%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.27%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
38.01%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.46%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.86%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 21.88%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.