PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.10%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.09%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-47.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-47.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.94%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.23%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
159.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 5.75%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
191.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 59.45%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
245.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 8.66%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
2350.83%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.55%
Below 50% of NEM's 572.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
228.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1189.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 9.30%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1571.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 20.76%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while NEM shows 16.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.73%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.82%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NEM's 427.78%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.