PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.56%
Negative revenue growth while NEM stands at 46.97%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.22%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NEM's 47.69%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-7.57%
Negative EBIT growth while NEM is at 211.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.57%
Negative operating income growth while NEM is at 211.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
12.24%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 226.30%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
18.18%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 226.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 225.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
184.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 47.47%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
151.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 99.36%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
127.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 99.06%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28313.94%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 222.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
380.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 158.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2594.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 176.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to NEM's 327.81%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1208.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 25.47%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
281.49%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.63%
AR growth well above NEM's 30.72%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Negative asset growth while NEM invests at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.09%
Similar to NEM's 4.31%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-7.99%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 7.11%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.22%
We expand SG&A while NEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.