PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.09%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.91%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.34%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.34%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-17.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
213.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 144.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
160.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 111.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
25.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NEM's 63.96%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.64%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 245.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
24.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NEM's 1032.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 490.43%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
15.46%
Below 50% of NEM's 637.53%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
443.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 28.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
64.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 13.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.90%
AR growth well above NEM's 11.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 1.55%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.12%
Under 50% of NEM's 6.28%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
270.10%
We have some new debt while NEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 16.00%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.