PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.75%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.32%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.60%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.60%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.65%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
94.44%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
88.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.02%
OCF growth under 50% of NEM's 17.04%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.57%
FCF growth under 50% of NEM's 41.45%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
118459836.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 125.26%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
221.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 95.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
104.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 16.57%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
6300.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 1976.56%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
379.59%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 282.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
143.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 83.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
122932.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 638.27% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
363.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 123.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
176.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 29.40%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 47.68%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 64.28%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.31%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NEM's 103.73%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
Similar asset growth to NEM's 4.64%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
5.84%
Similar to NEM's 5.54%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-6.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
We cut SG&A while NEM invests at 4400.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.