PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.12%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
25.66%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.79%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.79%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.19%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.07%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 33.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
32.30%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
35.01%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
145787334.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 160.55%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
152.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 65.41%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
148.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 43.95%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
47649.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 52.98%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 11.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
197.01%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
55639.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 585.05% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
261.20%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 118.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
302.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 31.24%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 46.37%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
92.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 53.20%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.48%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NEM's 25.93%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
Asset growth well under 50% of NEM's 6.64%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.14%
Similar to NEM's 2.03%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-7.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NEM's 153.33%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.