Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Revenue growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

Dividend growth above 1.5x NEM's 84.46%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 137.61%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 72.90%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 89.35%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 140.48%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 96.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 270.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 233.09%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 26.09%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 66.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Firm’s AR is declining while NEM shows 10.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 9.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.