PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.05%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.81%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
3.70%
EBIT growth below 50% of NEM's 11.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.70%
Operating income growth under 50% of NEM's 11.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.68%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 147.67%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.44%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 147.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
0.08%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.03%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
723.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 210.34%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
182.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 94.63%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
306.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 64.84%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
640.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 376.96%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
242.27%
Below 50% of NEM's 856.67%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
441.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 50.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
581.35%
Below 50% of NEM's 3198.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
268.71%
Below 50% of NEM's 556.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
644.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 147.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3089.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 41.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
147.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 29.67%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 42.14%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.82%
AR growth well above NEM's 96.84%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
Asset growth at 75-90% of NEM's 5.41%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.10%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.66%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.08%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 60.45%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.17%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NEM's 218.18%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.