PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
78.11%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
56.56%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
56.27%
EBIT growth above 1.5x NEM's 16.79%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
56.27%
Operating income growth above 1.5x NEM's 16.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
48.49%
Net income growth at 50-75% of NEM's 83.38%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
47.06%
EPS growth at 50-75% of NEM's 82.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of NEM's 82.43%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.14%
Share change of 0.14% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-30.00%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
97.45%
OCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 46.69%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
149.53%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 110.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
747.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 135.76%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
260.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 71.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
206.39%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
10355.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 190.21%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
365.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 14.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
245.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9636.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 530.14% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
349.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 312.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
237.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 19.39%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3155.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 97.24%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 66.65%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
74.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 27.39%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 77.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.69%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.43%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.62%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-12.48%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
We expand SG&A while NEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.