PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.08%
Negative gross profit growth while NEM is at 176.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-24.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-26.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 20.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-787.15%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
565.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 103.02%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
164.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 1.83%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
131.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
89499.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 156.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
177.71%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7607.09%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 115.93% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
200.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
188.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 101.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 60.21%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
75.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 20.59%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.56%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2077.39%
Debt growth far above NEM's 1.44%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NEM's 178.87%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.