PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NEM's 14.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of NEM's 74.38%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of NEM's 74.38%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 108.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 108.58%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 108.58%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-7.83%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-109.37%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
436.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 38.20%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
232.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 7.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
3.23%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5716.61%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
275.62%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-10.86%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
355.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.25% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
299.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-35.50%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 19.27%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 8.26%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
41.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while NEM invests at 3.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-13.59%
Firm’s AR is declining while NEM shows 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.93%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.04%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
SG&A growth of 34.32% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.