PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.27%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
9.27%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.27%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-92.92%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 18.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-94.44%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 19.44%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-94.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 19.44%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.20%
Share change of 0.20% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.19%
Diluted share count expanding well above NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-60.06%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
17.39%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.48%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-11.70%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
154.13%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
132.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-29.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
118.90%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 46.59% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-88.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-96.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while NEM stands at 20.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.73%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
40.25%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while NEM cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-64.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 4.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.13%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.58%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.66%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.03%
We have some new debt while NEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.