PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.36%
Negative revenue growth while NEM stands at 15.52%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-25.34%
Negative gross profit growth while NEM is at 139.09%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-25.34%
Negative EBIT growth while NEM is at 356.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.34%
Negative operating income growth while NEM is at 356.34%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1057.27%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.48%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.44%
Diluted share change of 3.44% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-8.03%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-21.81%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 72.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.44%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 357.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
299.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 45.28%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
43.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-30.25%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
511.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
22.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-45.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
269.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-65.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NEM is 101.44%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
583.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 14.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
94.31%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.88%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
98.06%
AR growth well above NEM's 20.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.60%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.03%
We have some new debt while NEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NEM's 6.67%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.