PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.03%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
5.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NEM's 14.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.03%
EBIT growth below 50% of NEM's 58.02%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of NEM's 58.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-5.02%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 1120.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-7.14%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 1133.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.14%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 1133.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.30%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 11.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-962.45%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 58.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
265.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 85.04%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
40.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-37.68%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
679.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 199.78%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
42.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-48.13%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
329.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 96.45% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-67.99%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1148.91%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 17.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.90%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
52.76%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.35%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.75%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
22.01%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.21%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-19.88%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.