PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.80%
Negative revenue growth while NEM stands at 6.55%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.19%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-3.19%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3.19%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-278.54%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 204.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-284.62%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-284.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x NEM's 3.25%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.06%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x NEM's 3.05%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-51.94%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 32.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-8.92%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 84.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.51%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 309.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
250.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 49.39%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
40.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-16.83%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
417.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 58.54%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
20.23%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-32.27%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM stands at 34.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-721.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while NEM is at 48.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-217.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-170.14%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
934.73%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 18.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
86.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
27.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.03%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-16.89%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.85%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.51%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.70%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.