PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.30%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.77%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.77%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-76.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.35%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
6.53%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while NEM cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
34.00%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-875.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
425.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 24.27%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
17.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-38.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
697.66%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-6.31%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-53.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
619.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 18.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
60.71%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-43.68%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 3.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
12.44%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-4.09%
We have a declining book value while NEM shows 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
126.58%
We have some new debt while NEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 4.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.