PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.25%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
29.46%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NEM's 5.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
37.40%
EBIT growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.02%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
37.40%
Operating income growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
47.16%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
40.00%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
40.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.38%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 10.58%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.40%
Diluted share count expanding well above NEM's 10.58%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.03%
OCF growth under 50% of NEM's 48.85%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
16.51%
FCF growth under 50% of NEM's 114.67%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
122.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 21.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-11.80%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
3.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.41%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 80.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-35.46%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is at 62.03%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-12.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM stands at 133.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
19.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-67.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-31.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NEM is 100.98%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
304.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 0.26%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
59.92%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.39%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while NEM is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-67.63%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
156.53%
AR growth well above NEM's 15.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.03%
Negative asset growth while NEM invests at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
7.42%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-48.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
We cut SG&A while NEM invests at 12.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.