PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.82%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
27.82%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.04%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
33.04%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
37.61%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
35.71%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
35.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.90%
Slight or no buybacks while NEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.13%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-47.91%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 8.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.34%
OCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 9.91%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-582.88%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 26.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
179.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 37.73%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
0.97%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
13.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
185.85%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of NEM's 221.66%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-22.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
9.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NEM's 82.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
84.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-50.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.06%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
302.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 4.12%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
57.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
20.67%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.03%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while NEM is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-56.25%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-15.57%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.65%
Under 50% of NEM's 6.22%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
90.51%
We have some new debt while NEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.