PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.48%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.24%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
61.16%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
61.16%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
739.91%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 4250.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
766.67%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 4110.53%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 4224.32%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 1.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.97%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
9.36%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
264.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.68%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
9.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
8.83%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
210.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 30.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-17.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is at 195.84%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-5.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM stands at 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
130.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-42.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
26.90%
Below 50% of NEM's 62.92%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
180.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 5.80%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.01%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of NEM's 0.80%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.04%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.01%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 2.63%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.36%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.