PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.14%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.42%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
30.60%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
30.60%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.41%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 45.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.53%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 47.83%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 47.83%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
34.67%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
35.67%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
126.65%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
61.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
26.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.56%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
135.70%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
65.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
45.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 65.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
62.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
59.02%
Below 50% of NEM's 175.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
52.81%
Below 50% of NEM's 1052.95%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
125.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 16.89%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while NEM is at 27.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.78%
Below 50% of NEM's 33.66%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.93%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.65%
We have a declining book value while NEM shows 3.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-18.14%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.