PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NEM's 13.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-6.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
11.50%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.29%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.19%
Slight or no buybacks while NEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.26%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
99.48%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
35.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
22.28%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
73.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
19.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.85%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
77.41%
Below 50% of NEM's 200.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
54.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 30.48%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
123.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 17.08%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
9.22%
Below 50% of NEM's 22.78%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
6.03%
Below 50% of NEM's 33.65%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
Below 50% of NEM's 1049.16%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
56.86%
Below 50% of NEM's 394.13%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
94433.33%
AR growth well above NEM's 15.91%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.47%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.22%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.34%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 10.77%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.