PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.24%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.19%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.00%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.00%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.04%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.86%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 37.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
11.63%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-63.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
60.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
54.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
60.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 5.38%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
43.28%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
82.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 4.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
82.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 113.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
4.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
254.38%
Below 50% of NEM's 597.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
134.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 94.10%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
90.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 1.01%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of NEM's 32.29%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
16.45%
Below 50% of NEM's 45.80%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while NEM stands at 266.79%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-31.41%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.48%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.60%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-98.25%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 1.56%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.