PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.44%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.36%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.09%
EBIT growth below 50% of NEM's 115.63%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.09%
Operating income growth under 50% of NEM's 115.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 1073.91%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-46.15%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 1067.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-46.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 1070.54%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.13%
Slight or no buybacks while NEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.05%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
7.81%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
251.29%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
20.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
51.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 22.24%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
34.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
0.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
71.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 24.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
75.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
151.82%
Below 50% of NEM's 539.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
170.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of NEM's 246.76%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
80.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.40%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
24.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 33.79%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
19.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 37.57%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.73%
AR growth well above NEM's 22.55%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-15.06%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.76%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.46%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
We expand SG&A while NEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.