PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.06%
Negative EBIT growth while NEM is at 835.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.06%
Negative operating income growth while NEM is at 835.14%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 123.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 123.40%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 123.40%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-21.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-60.38%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-18.34%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
5.34%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-16.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NEM stands at 5.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-36.08%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
5.49%
Below 50% of NEM's 23.00%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-24.69%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-34.59%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
60.03%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 22.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
16.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
65.46%
Positive growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
35.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 23.23%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
28.74%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-37.75%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 12.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.13%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 12.12%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.