PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.55%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
29.24%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
37.10%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
37.10%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
26.98%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
28.00%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
28.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.12%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.13%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share change of 0.09% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.79%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 37.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
10.57%
FCF growth under 50% of NEM's 204.44%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
24.38%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
22.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 8.23%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
5.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NEM's 14.59%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
26.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 43.92%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
46.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 11.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
32.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 0.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
55.82%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 104.80%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-56.49%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
32.42%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
66.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 7.06%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
27.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 19.20%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
25.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
13.23%
Similar 10Y dividend/share CAGR to NEM's 14.25%. Walter Schloss expects both to share consistent earnings expansions and payout practices.
101.95%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 188.11%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
59.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to NEM's 59.80%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
-26.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-24.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.37%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.38%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
269.36%
We have some new debt while NEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.