PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.09%
Revenue growth under 50% of NEM's 6.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.25%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
4.11%
EBIT growth 75-90% of NEM's 5.27%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
4.11%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of NEM's 5.27%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
26.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x NEM's 8.09%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
25.93%
EPS growth above 1.5x NEM's 8.11%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x NEM's 8.11%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.05%
Slight or no buybacks while NEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.04%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-49.72%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
8.76%
OCF growth under 50% of NEM's 18.22%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
20.73%
FCF growth 50-75% of NEM's 29.80%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
46.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 14.74%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
35.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 21.35%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
13.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 10.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
66.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 121.28%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
76.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 48.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
25.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 0.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2617.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 88.32% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
100.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
13.76%
Below 50% of NEM's 21308.83%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
59.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 24.52%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
37.47%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
20.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
208.45%
Below 50% of NEM's 857.11%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
111.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 87.58%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
21.38%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while NEM cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
35.90%
AR growth well above NEM's 1.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above NEM's 1.26%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.90%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.89%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.34%
75-90% of NEM's 1.66%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-1.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.27%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 13.00%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.