PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Negative revenue growth while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.53%
Negative gross profit growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.53%
Negative EBIT growth while OR is at 18.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.53%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 18.62%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.45%
Negative net income growth while OR stands at 6687.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-18.18%
Negative EPS growth while OR is at 7094.12%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OR is at 7094.12%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.04%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
1085.59%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
5Y CAGR of 198.96% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-24.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2800.51%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
222.96%
Positive OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-39.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1699.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 456.64% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
186.89%
Below 50% of OR's 456.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-57.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR is 456.64%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
5331.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 5331.89% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
123.30%
Equity/share CAGR of 123.30% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
41.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.24% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 317.42% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
57.80%
AR growth of 57.80% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Asset growth of 1.00% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
1.92%
BV/share growth of 1.92% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
0.02%
Debt growth of 0.02% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OR's 48.71%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.