PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.36%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-25.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-25.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1057.27%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.48%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 48.46%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.44%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 44.74%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-8.03%
Dividend reduction while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-15.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
299.53%
10Y CAGR of 299.53% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
43.11%
5Y CAGR of 43.11% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-30.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
511.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
22.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-45.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
269.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-65.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
583.10%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
94.31%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.88%
Negative near-term dividend growth while OR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
98.06%
Our AR growth while OR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Asset growth well under 50% of OR's 39.94%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-2.60%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.03%
Debt growth of 0.03% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OR's 107.49%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.