PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OR's 9.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.30%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OR's 9.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
2.77%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.77%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-76.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Share reduction while OR is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Reduced diluted shares while OR is at 4.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.53%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while OR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
34.00%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-875.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
425.17%
10Y CAGR of 425.17% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
17.39%
5Y CAGR of 17.39% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-38.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
697.66%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-6.31%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-53.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
619.11%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
60.71%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Negative near-term dividend growth while OR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-43.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
12.44%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
126.58%
Debt growth of 126.58% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
SG&A growth well above OR's 49.88%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.