PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OR's 14.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.15%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.15%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.06%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 0.65%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
3.61%
Dividend growth above 1.5x OR's 2.02%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-7.33%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-7.91%
Negative FCF growth while OR is at 129.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
88.45%
10Y CAGR of 88.45% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
31.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 221.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 174.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
16.03%
Below 50% of OR's 49.65%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-25.58%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
16.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
23.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
603.37%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
136.18%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
21.55%
Below 50% of OR's 172.32%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
6.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.38% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
47.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 24.86%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
17.16%
Our AR growth while OR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.16%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-13.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OR's 84.70%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.