95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.85%
Positive gross profit growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.90%
Negative EBIT growth while OR is at 195.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.90%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 195.82%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of OR's 197.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of OR's 188.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OR's 193.35%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 11.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 6.08%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
99.48%
10Y CAGR of 99.48% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
35.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 124.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
22.28%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 43.74%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
73.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.11%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to OR's 27.63%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
19.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.85%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 100.77%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
77.41%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to OR's 84.65%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
54.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
123.94%
Equity/share CAGR of 123.94% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
9.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 34.61%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 8.90%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
94433.33%
Our AR growth while OR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of OR's 5.57%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.22%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
We expand SG&A while OR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.