95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.85%
Negative revenue growth while OR stands at 15.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.30%
Negative gross profit growth while OR is at 6.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.90%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
6.06%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
6.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.09%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.31%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
25.60%
Dividend growth above 1.5x OR's 16.79%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-8.83%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-8.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
50.22%
10Y CAGR of 50.22% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
27.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 193.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
16.22%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
30.94%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
39.76%
Below 50% of OR's 126.35%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
24.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 47.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
0.37%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
183.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
212.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 106.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
98.34%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 7.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
14.87%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.09%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 71.29%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
39.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 0.78%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-3.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
238799900.00%
We show growth while OR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.20%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 8.96%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.85%
Under 50% of OR's 15.06%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-59.56%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 125.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.