PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.44%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of OR's 17.22%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
19.36%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OR's 4.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
12.09%
EBIT growth below 50% of OR's 130.35%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.09%
Operating income growth under 50% of OR's 130.35%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while OR stands at 73.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-46.15%
Negative EPS growth while OR is at 74.54%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-46.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OR is at 74.54%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.13%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.05%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while OR stands at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
7.81%
OCF growth under 50% of OR's 84.87%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
251.29%
FCF growth above 1.5x OR's 102.56%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
20.66%
10Y CAGR of 20.66% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
51.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 121.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
34.55%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
0.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
71.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 25.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
75.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.12%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OR is at 82.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
151.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
170.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 80.65%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
80.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 80.17% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
24.93%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
19.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 2.47%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.73%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OR's 1083.45%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-15.06%
Inventory is declining while OR stands at 34.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.76%
Asset growth well under 50% of OR's 22.02%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.46%
Under 50% of OR's 17.37%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
SG&A growth well above OR's 5.73%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.