PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-37.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-31.50%
Negative EBIT growth while OR is at 6436.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.50%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 6436.42%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
31.79%
Net income growth at 50-75% of OR's 63.26%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
30.30%
EPS growth under 50% of OR's 61.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
30.30%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OR's 62.34%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.05%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-52.12%
Dividend reduction while OR stands at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-25.13%
Negative OCF growth while OR is at 17080.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.96%
Negative FCF growth while OR is at 170.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6.31%
10Y CAGR of 6.31% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
5.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-3.20%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-5.92%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
17.09%
Below 50% of OR's 2544.82%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
7.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 4.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
28.59%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
188.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of OR's 216.74%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
155.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to OR's 147.36%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
72.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 72.43% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
26.47%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.52%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
24.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.20% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
49.75%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 99.25%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
70.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 12.61%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-31.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.56%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.00%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-11.95%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.