PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.14%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 25.68%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.47%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 77.32%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-7.96%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 2229.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.96%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 2229.41%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-5.12%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 9600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Slight or no buybacks while PAAS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.31%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.11%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 213.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.11%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
46.59%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 236.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
24.76%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 121.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
36.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 73.26%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 256.52%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
-45.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 134.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 108.64%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
196.05%
Equity/share CAGR of 196.05% while PAAS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
188.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 140.67%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
291.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 183.21%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 1.29%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.14%
Under 50% of PAAS's 8.81%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.33%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.