PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.51%
Revenue growth under 50% of PAAS's 28.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 18.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
118.24%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PAAS's 31.02%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
118.24%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 31.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
5.52%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 81.28%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 77.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 95.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.72%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
5.55%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
160.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 231.31%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
144.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 273.80%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
42.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 355.98%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2634.32%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 740.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
43040.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 963.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3534.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 433.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
405.46%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of PAAS's 533.25%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
766.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 329.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
921.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 97.44%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 60.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.88%
Asset growth well under 50% of PAAS's 7.80%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.73%
50-75% of PAAS's 6.63%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.28%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.