95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.10%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.09%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-47.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-47.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.94%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.23%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
159.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 200.38%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
191.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 138.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
245.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 124.79%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
2350.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 507.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.55%
Below 50% of PAAS's 893.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
228.94%
Below 50% of PAAS's 4056.56%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1189.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 260.14%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1571.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 55.33%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.73%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.07%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 4.22%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.