95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.56%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 26.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.22%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 63.92%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-7.57%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 96.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.57%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 96.74%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
12.24%
Net income growth at 75-90% of PAAS's 15.71%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
18.18%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 15.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 15.15%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
184.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 460.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
151.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 795.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
127.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 259.68%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28313.94%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 2527.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
380.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 538.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2594.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 1858.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
303.15%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1034.30%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1208.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 266.91%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
281.49%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 118.68%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.63%
AR growth well above PAAS's 24.43%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 10.98%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.09%
Under 50% of PAAS's 10.42%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.99%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.22%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.