PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.49%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.48%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.13%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.13%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.66%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-23.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.21%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 2.80%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.66%
Reduced diluted shares while PAAS is at 1.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.47%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 160.95%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.47%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 61.94%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
180.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 291.10%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
89.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 433.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
92.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 282.72%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
629.21%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1309.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
189.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 3212.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.60%
Below 50% of PAAS's 3207.04%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
158.49%
Below 50% of PAAS's 78123.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1024.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 280.30%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
261.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 124.92%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 17.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.52%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 5.99%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while PAAS shows 2.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
27.56%
Debt growth far above PAAS's 43.27%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 135.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.