PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-29.83%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.11%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.01%
Share change of 4.01% while PAAS is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.11%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-41.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
115.32%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 230.12%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
59.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 332.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
46.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 119.13%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
580.66%
Below 50% of PAAS's 3028.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
89.09%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 344.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
506.67%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1163.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
114.08%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of PAAS's 127.82%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
934.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 241.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1372.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 153.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
249.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 108.62%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.67%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 1.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.58%
50-75% of PAAS's 0.82%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-27.61%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.