PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-82.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-95.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-95.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-362.24%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-300.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-325.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
16.15%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 3.92%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1.52%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
80.95%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PAAS's 75.00%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
-0.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 140.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.83%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25090.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 101.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
89.40%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-966.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-585.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS is 1.03%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1055.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 149.17%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
129.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 122.09%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.08%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-9.40%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
5.91%
We have some new debt while PAAS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.39%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 137.31%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.