95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Revenue growth under 50% of PAAS's 52.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
428.44%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 2518.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1191.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PAAS's 122.37%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1191.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 122.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
130.31%
Net income growth comparable to PAAS's 119.84%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
133.33%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 119.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 120.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-7.04%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 70.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 291.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
201.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 198.55%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-0.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 23.78%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
13.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1260.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-25.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS is 292.53%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 108.63%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
94.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 147.71%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
AR growth well above PAAS's 24.67%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Asset growth well under 50% of PAAS's 11.42%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
27.41%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 10.97%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-58.40%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.