PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.09%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.91%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.34%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.34%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-17.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
213.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 465.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
160.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 222.48%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
25.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 96.95%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.64%
Below 50% of PAAS's 941.19%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
24.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 1262.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 536.16%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
15.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
443.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 234.25%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
64.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 88.54%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.90%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Asset growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 3.08%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.12%
50-75% of PAAS's 4.33%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
270.10%
We have some new debt while PAAS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.