PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.91%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-3.96%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-8.80%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-9.52%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-9.52%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.03%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.02%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while PAAS cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-0.62%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-82.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
56.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 454.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
176.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 141.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
229.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 107.74%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
12196.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 2043.92%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
268.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 306.14%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
426.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 199.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
10696.01%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 2490.69% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
273.92%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 125.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
367.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PAAS's 512.08%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
2022.77%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 759.27%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
155.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 129.08%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
97.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 62.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.73%
AR growth well above PAAS's 45.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 2.25%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.99%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-7.69%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 7.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.