PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.60%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.21%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.18%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.74%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1.18%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
7.19%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 82.14%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.89%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 85.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.89%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 89.58%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.06%
Slight or no buybacks while PAAS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.02%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
199.89%
Dividend growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.89%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-2.13%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 15.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
453.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x PAAS's 34.45%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
571.98%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PAAS's 599.61%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
174.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 87.16%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
295.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 254.41%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
9273.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 3757.13%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
242.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 470.65%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
489.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 405245.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
13730.08%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 881.36% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
280.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 134.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
321.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 321.05%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
2138.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 873.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
158.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 126.58%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
128.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 79.54%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.87%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.04%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.81%
Similar to PAAS's 5.18%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-8.33%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 438.34%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.24%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 2.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.