PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.08%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.72%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 280.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.72%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 280.62%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.94%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 169.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-24.00%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 168.42%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-26.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 152.63%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 150.63%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-787.15%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
565.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 935.81%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
164.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 15.71%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
131.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 29.05%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
89499.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 2154.22%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.34%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
177.71%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7607.09%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 708.46% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
200.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
188.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 655.43%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 105.89%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
75.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 34.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 22.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.82%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
2077.39%
We have some new debt while PAAS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 26.22%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.