95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 9.03%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 66.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 105.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 105.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 102.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 102.58%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 102.58%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-7.83%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-109.37%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
436.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 393.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
232.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 65.44%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
3.23%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5716.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 3379.69%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
275.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 473.27%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-10.86%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
355.00%
Below 50% of PAAS's 767.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
299.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-35.50%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 217.20%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 52.04%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
41.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 7.01%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PAAS invests at 396.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-13.59%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 2.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.93%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 114.37%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.