PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.03%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 9.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
5.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 112.31%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.03%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 98.19%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 98.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-5.02%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 96.32%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-7.14%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 96.26%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.14%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 96.26%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.30%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 1351.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-962.45%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 30.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
265.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 205.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
40.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-37.68%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
679.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 102.95%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
42.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-48.13%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
329.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-67.99%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1148.91%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 154.11%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.90%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
52.76%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 2.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.35%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
22.01%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-19.88%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 8.08%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 86.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.